Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (9396)	9/21/2000 5:35:01 AM
From: boris_a	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Tony, I don't think I did throw shit at you. All I wanted to know is a rational explanation for the problems of Intel. Or do you think they don't have any (seroius ones)? I named the failures. It's a handsome list. So my question is: what's happening there? So an explanation like "Intel not having put teams A,B or C on the ... thing" raises a simple question: where are these A,B, or C teams put on? And where are the results? BTW, the way they boosted the PIII performance by enhancing the L2 cache was classy. Maybe this was team B. If I was an Intel investor, I were pretty concerned about that. Sorry for my englishish, but content should be understandable. Boris PS. For me your name remains linked to the sentence I quoted. It's this kind of "Intel can do it anytime it chooses" thinking. Is this the internal Intel virus? Hm, maybe you indirectly gave the answer to my question already.