SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cosmicforce who wrote (965)9/20/2000 5:39:01 PM
From: cosmicforce  Respond to of 28931
 
The other thing I find totally objectionable is his famous position that Good Works are irrelevant and that God only cares about the internal ideology. This is a rejection of the Earthly consequences and the causal nature of human conduct. One would have to infer, by logical extension, that Bad Works similarly can't be judged on Earth. This opens the door to any kind of evil as long as it is consistent and derived from a devotion to God. This is reprehensible and is unbearable for those of us with whom these devoted people live. It is the same kind of thing that allows the devout to blow up abortion clinics.



To: cosmicforce who wrote (965)9/20/2000 8:27:37 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
Luther was- according to Barzun- a "primitivist"- wishing to return to some pure state of commerce between man and God with no establishment in the way, a state of nature- in essence- akin to the relationship between Adam and God. Barzun thinks of Luther as a forerunner of the naturalists, folks like Rousseau. Which I found interesting. I had never thought of Luther in quite that way.