Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (20157)	9/20/2000 6:53:34 PM
From: Terry Whitman	Respond to of 436258

He'll make a nice partner at Goldman some day, won't he. hohoho OOOOhnooooo- I fell out of the wedge! stockcharts.com Hep me PPT, Hep me!

To: Mama Bear who wrote (20157)	9/20/2000 6:58:42 PM
From: maceng2	Respond to of 436258

After a suitable period to reflect on all the terrible things that 15 yr old has done...Someone is going to hire that guy. I expect he will command high wages too. What a market. Pearly.

To: Mama Bear who wrote (20157)	9/20/2000 6:58:48 PM
From: robnhood	Respond to of 436258

Ho ho ho--<<Without admitting or denying the findings, -- << Where have I seen that line before?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (20157)	9/20/2000 7:08:58 PM
From: Les H	Respond to of 436258

Good thing, he didn't predict Amazon to $ 400, Rambus to $ 500, or Qualcomm to $ 800.

To: Mama Bear who wrote (20157)	9/20/2000 8:33:53 PM
From: Mike M2	Respond to of 436258

Barb, he would do well on Wall st -he knows the game -g- mike

To: Mama Bear who wrote (20157)	9/20/2000 10:11:07 PM
From: Gary M. Reed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 436258

he claimed in one of his messages that a company trading at $2 per share would be trading at more than $20 per share "very soon." And therein lies his mistake. Tout a $2 stock by saying it's going to $20 and you're a criminal. Tout a $50 stock by saying it's going to $1,000 and you're an analyst. ...The postings Lebed made to Internet website message boards included baseless price predictions and other false and/or misleading statements...The posted messages always caused the price and volume of the touted stocks to increase dramatically. Sooo...what's the difference between posting such rubbish on a message board, vis-a-vis putting it on a brokerage firm letterhead, calling it "research" and faxing a copy to The Ferret so she can pimp it for you from the floor of the NYSE each morning? Am I right in assuming the SEC is more concerned with the way false and misleading statements are distributed, rather than the false and misleading statements themselves?