SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Harmond who wrote (1566)9/20/2000 10:05:55 PM
From: HG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57684
 
<<<Oil costs $6 a barrel to find, and natural gas 40 cents per mcf>>>

Could I ask you for a pointer to the source of these numbers ?

I was never concerned about the rate hikes...the oil crisis is another matter, considering the history...in 1990, it was the Arab fear, resentment for Saddam, and the obligation felt by a few OPEC countries towards the West which played a significant part in containing the situation...

I doubt if it ever will come to that...but if it were to, wouldn't the market dislocation, to use your words, be stretched over a significant period if we were to find, produce and distribute ? What of that ?



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (1566)9/20/2000 10:57:35 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57684
 
<Oil costs $6 a barrel to find, and natural gas 40 cents per mcf. Add about the same amounts to produce and distribute, and the rest is temporary market dislocation.>

Not to be argumentative, but when has NG traded 80 cents??? And if oil traded $15 per barrel long term, all drillers would go out of business, so I think your numbers are more than a bit off for NG and somewhat off for oil.

<Right now energy costs are like a tax hike...they just slow the overall economy some. >

I agree, but the effect of this depends on many things, like where are we in the business cycle?? Are equities under or over valued? We've had a record expansion fueled in part by large debt run ups... if we're due for a recession ANYWAY... then the effect of what's happening now may be WAY underestimated by WS IMO... let's face it... so far WS yawns at this 'new tax'.

DAK



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (1566)9/21/2000 11:56:40 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57684
 
If the
Fed were to monetize the higher costs then we'd be in for inflation...but we learned that lesson
in the 1970's.


William,

I need educated. What is monetizing the higher costs? My gues is a Fed rate decrease? I really have no clue.