Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mad Bomber who wrote (20477)	9/21/2000 2:02:35 PM
From: Mark[ox5]	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21342

YEs and 95% of them turned into Dr Koop.com Thats not a good way to rationalize valuation... just because other companies are valued in excess, doesnt mean this should be. THere were a lot of dot.com's valued at $5-$10 billion 12-28 months ago, many now are under $500 million. So this is a ridiculous arguement: Many internet companies have gone over a billion with little revenue and negative profits Most "internet" companies were/are pure junk and hype and just because the market afforded them premium valuations during a tulip mania, (and has since corrected the vast majority of them) I would not use that as a reason to pump up the valuation of other stocks because of "internet affiliation"