Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alexandermf who wrote (38903)	9/21/2000 3:00:43 PM
From: kvkkc1	Respond to of 769667

Acceptable response.knc

To: Alexandermf who wrote (38903)	9/21/2000 3:12:54 PM
From: haqihana	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Alex, I can agree with your point, only to a degree. The woman has the option to say "no". If the man ignores this "no", he has committed rape, and should be prosecuted for the crime. Also, if the man is so insensitive, that he does not take preventive precautions, the woman should insist that he does, or pull up her pants, and go home. The final decision to have sex without protection against pregnancy, lies with the woman. In effect, she calls the shots, except in the case of rape, and incest. If she exercises none of her options to prevent an unwanted pregnancy, then IMO, she should pay the price and deliver the baby. As I said earlier, any man that does not abide by the woman's decision, should be punished for his violation of the woman. ~H~