SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JLS who wrote (35773)9/21/2000 7:03:24 PM
From: Smart_Money  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57584
 
40% man o' man. It should be illegal, heck if I had that much of one stock, I would be eating and sleeping at the front door of the company with my ears on the railroad tracks.



To: JLS who wrote (35773)9/21/2000 7:13:35 PM
From: Wes Stevens  Respond to of 57584
 
It is not illegal as long as their prospectus tells the world about it.

The stupid probably applies more to the people that put their money into a fund after looking at last years return and never read what the fund invests in.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News