Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: McNabb Brothers who wrote (5384)	9/21/2000 7:52:05 PM
From: Bosco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

Hi Hank - are you still holding BVSN? Maybe it will be alright, since it is in the strong B2B sector. With CMGI having some good rev, the whole sector could benefit. I don't have why BVSN is a laggard though, maybe it is b/c of ALLR demise. best, Bosco

To: McNabb Brothers who wrote (5384)	9/21/2000 8:01:29 PM
From: Mark Ivan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

Hank, I'm sort of thinking in similar ways. Tomorrow may not be that bad. I think with the market being on the over sold side a bit, we may see some good short covering throughout the day. At any rate, I jumped into MU and INTC after hours for a short term play. My experience has shown that after hours trading is always carried to the extreme. Sure hope I am right. Mark

To: McNabb Brothers who wrote (5384)	9/21/2000 8:13:25 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

>>I remember when everyone use to say that the markets could not move up much without MSFT moving up also, and GM and was a bell weather, so it could be that after a company becomes so big it looses some of it's staying power and people begin to redeploy their money in smaller companies that are growing much faster. INTC may be the next to fall from grace.<< I postulated on this thread several days ago that I was thinking it was possible for the NAZ to forge ahead without the participation of INTC and to a lesser extent CSCO. I guess we'll find out soon enough.

To: McNabb Brothers who wrote (5384)	9/21/2000 11:05:31 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

Hank, I like your bravado, but in your place, I would look for real signs of a turn around, an extreme change in the tic from very negative accompanied by TRIN under 1.00 will do for me. I still think that we have a good 275 additional Naz points to go through 9as i said today before the INTC bomb), and if that creates enough of a negative reading in my sentiments indicators, I'll be jumping as well. In the morning, however, I will be looking at minimizing the damage 9and buying more SCMR around the $100 area if they give it to me <g>). Zeev