Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (20633)	9/21/2000 9:53:51 PM
From: AllansAlias	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Very probable Haim. I think we can not tell very much tonight, so I will have two plans for tomorrow -- you scenario and a relentless grinding down scenario. A general comment (not to you Haim): Myth is right and wrong imo about markets needing a bigger reason to crash. I think there are already some big reasons and it is often a specific smaller event that starts the ball rolling. People are going to tell us that, well, everything would have been alright if not for INTC. This is complete chit. When we gap down over supports, those supports are broken regardless of the reason. The charts don't give a rat's azz why support fails. They only register it did and then remember/resist going forward. Those who have never believed that there was a clear and present danger will get a hard lesson that was always there for the studying -- and the avoiding.