SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hank2010 who wrote (13712)9/22/2000 10:24:07 AM
From: Phil Jones  Respond to of 14627
 
Yes, you're right Hank. I retain a bit of hope. Though the $1.30 price at present reflects the incredible letdown after all the hype. Whatever the reality of what's in the ground, from what I've seen the price of junior gold stocks moves mainly on sentiment and emotion. This stock was so hyped that I think the first drill holes would have had to have come in with INCREDIBLY SPECTACULAR results (with neon lights flashing) just to have maintained the share price in the $5 range. Anything less than INCREDIBLY SPECTACULAR results would send it plummeting. We're into a different world than the pre-Bre-X world. Sentiment on gold generally seems so low that it'll soon be hard to give the stuff away. I wonder where the current sentiment will bottom the stock? Phil



To: hank2010 who wrote (13712)9/22/2000 10:35:50 AM
From: Quinn  Respond to of 14627
 
I agree. Only four holes and everyone runs for cover. All this has created is a great buying opportunity and for everyone who sells someone is buying! PFG has had a good house cleaning in the last couple of days. They are drilling one hole per day and there will be a constant flow of drill results on a regular basis from here on. This is still the only show in town.



To: hank2010 who wrote (13712)9/22/2000 11:59:51 AM
From: Elizabeth Andrews  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14627
 
How do you come up with 3.37 million ozs based on four holes? You shouldn't make a statement like this as it is incorrect at this time.