SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marginmike who wrote (81207)9/22/2000 12:00:02 PM
From: Jordan Levitt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Hi Mike,

You may be right over the next few weeks. Looking a little further out, like say November, we are setting up nicely for a year end buying panic. The portfolio managers, will play their usual games, window dressing, reduce the cash levels before year end etc. I think the money is going to fall right into the large cap tech stocks that we all know and love. It happens every year.

BRCM at 150 ? That would concern me! Take care



To: marginmike who wrote (81207)9/22/2000 12:01:39 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Respond to of 152472
 
a big HEAD FAKE

INTC down 20% in one day is not a head fake. INTC's $75 billion devaluation today is like erasing 1.5 QCOMs from the market. Just another instance of the rolling corrections this market is famous for. High valuations don't kill stocks; they just worsen the risk/reward ratio. Fact is, stocks are killed by worsening fundamentals. Worsening fundamentals, to the extent that they are sector-specific, are expressed by rolling corrections. Osmotic effect on market as a whole is increased volatility.



To: marginmike who wrote (81207)9/22/2000 12:03:39 PM
From: Keith Feral  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
MM: Stocks like BRCM make zero economic sense. The overvaluation of BRCM is crazy. If BRCM were to trade at the same Price to sales ratio as QCOM, the stock would be trading at $50.



To: marginmike who wrote (81207)9/22/2000 6:34:21 PM
From: waverider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
oops!