SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ask DrBob -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Louis V. Lambrecht who wrote (6107)9/22/2000 2:51:43 PM
From: iowamann, Spam Queen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 100058
 
LV, although you are joking around, Bush is good for BA and other defense stocks.

A bad market would sure hurt Gore more than Bush.

And I firmly believe Gore is bad for the market in years to come.

Although you are highly bullish, I see problems, at least for the economy, in the near future.

However, with our short attention spans, is anybody still talking about oil.



To: Louis V. Lambrecht who wrote (6107)9/22/2000 3:01:00 PM
From: Joseph Silent  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 100058
 
Something very wrong with quote.com's trin .......

somebody confirm plizz?

Does not match with e-signal ..... e-signal's trinq
looks very normal .... but quote's is all over the place ...



To: Louis V. Lambrecht who wrote (6107)9/22/2000 3:10:46 PM
From: Jennifer O  Respond to of 100058
 
LVL, I am in the same boat with you. I don't think convential TA gives a timely indication. When all the indicator turns positive, it will be toooooooo late. Aug. 31 is a good example. I brought my QQQ puts becasuse everything is so perfect, there are nothing to propell the market higher (except CNBC's side line money story). I just don't see Naz tank to 3500 from. Notice the past few days we have been rallying at close (pro time).

But that said, I am born TAURUS........., kicking myself for not be able to stick around when QCOM tanked to 69. (I had a limited order at 68)