Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (110891)	9/22/2000 5:44:18 PM
From: L. Adam Latham	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

albert: Re: Fidelity sees $40 Now albert, don't start making up your own false headlines. The astute reader would realize it was Waddell & Reed Financial Inc. that said INTC could see $40. The article clearly says Fidelity doesn't comment on individual stocks. Nice try, though. Adam

To: AK2004 who wrote (110891)	9/22/2000 6:09:50 PM
From: Joseph Pareti	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

so Fidelity is just another lemming ? ok, there may be other, more fundamental reasons for the shortfall besides the crap euro (which i see heading to 50 cents), but, gee, give me a break will you ? Turn the clock back one year and look around for the naysayers' posts on this thread. Pre-split it was 35 bucks or so. The talk was Cumine and RAMBUS screw up. Where has it gone ever since ? One should not expect any parabolic and not even linear stock growth (after all, Mary is right, they are engineers and may not quite master the art of slinging BS, and they are no godzilla.com either). This is what makes them strong. Isn't Intel the ideal match to Warren's theory 'forget the market folly' ?