SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Catcher who wrote (108864)9/23/2000 10:13:59 AM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
>> so you think it is plausible that revenues can shrivel for the company that produces 90% of the chips that go into pc's but the problem will remain confined to intc?
<<

Actually yes. Intel stock takes these dives and stays there for a long time while their customers prosper. For a really radical example of how suppliers suffer while a customers get super rich look at disk drive companies. They are at death's door while their customers (EMC, NTAP) are flying euphorically at all-time highs.

For the box makers the issue is unit counts. It is irrelevant how little profit Intel makes on the processors. Did Intel say their unit volume was down in Europe or anywhere ? And is the sum of AMD+INTC unit volume up in mid-teens from a year ago ? I think the answers to these questions are more helpful than knowing Intel's exact gross margin. The latter is very important to INTC speculators, but hardly anyone else.



To: Catcher who wrote (108864)9/23/2000 10:18:12 AM
From: Bill Harmond  Respond to of 164684
 
>>you think it is plausible that revenues can shrivel for the company that produces 90% of the chips that go into pc's but the problem will remain confined to intc?

Absolutely. Intel has screwed up its model with all these (anti-AMD) low-end product lines, trying to be all things to all OEM's. Intel's unit sales are growing faster than revenues by a wide margin.