Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mark cox who wrote (15109)	9/23/2000 2:37:33 PM
From: JimC1997	Respond to of 18366

Mark, As you say, ekn is probably right about EDIG. After all, anyone who posts as he did in response to suggestions that he uses multiple aliases in an attempt to manipulate investors in this stock: ekn #14405: "Utter and complete false accusation based on 0 evidence. don't worry it's an ongoing feud between that poster and myself. I'd like him to give one piece of solid evidence that any of his claim has merit. Simply put EKN does not equal his accusation. Plain and simple." And again today, ekn #15105: "Plays right into hands like mine becasue it causes volatility" obviously must be taken at face value. JimC

To: mark cox who wrote (15109)	9/23/2000 2:50:06 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 18366

Mark--Thank you for describing nicely most of the reasons as to why I bought EDIG and remain a committed long. That the second and third investments of my life--the ones which Jon Tara alluded to in his earlier diatribe against me--went belly up, never detracted me from finding good stocks afterwards. And among my subsequent successful ventures I certainly count EDIG among them. I've already profited from EDIG and will again. For me? It's that simple.

To: mark cox who wrote (15109)	9/23/2000 3:17:31 PM
From: ekn	Respond to of 18366

LOL. No, i don't think 100,000 individual investors can spot a gem without huge funds having a clue. Do i think gorilla's look at all technologies with potential. YES. Did i say that there has to be some legitimacy to edig? YES. To what extent? Your guess is as good as mine. tell me why havent they got their Nasdaq listing when RP said they were oh so close in JUNE? I can name many many companies who have listed so much faster that i'd fill the page. and as a stock i followed for some time, I know that wavx was accepted with 0 revenues, 0 product deployed, no revenue streams and they still dont 1 1/2 years later. But they were listed in 5 months. So what does the Nasdaq listing officer see that you don't? Why does edig hype so much? Cinderella story. maybe Bill murray, anything else is 10,000-1. nothing you have stated is impressive. No one has paid edig ANY substantial revenues. If you think 1 MM dollars with 125MM out is substantive, you are wrong. Does it matter if it is more money than they have ever made in 10 years/ NO. What would a wallstreet analyst say about acompany with basically nothing in sales, a whole lot of promising with 0 execution. Delay===excuse. What can you tell me as fact when you say delay? because RP told U so? RP is a spin doctor my man. yeah, i think 100,000 individuals can spot a gem before Peter Lynch + the rest of wll street and I can dunk over Shaq.