Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JimC1997 who wrote (15119)	9/23/2000 4:24:55 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

JimC, if you say that you are distinguished among the field of those that post under multiple aliases, I beleive you. "unlike some who post under multiple aliases"

To: JimC1997 who wrote (15119)	9/23/2000 7:55:48 PM
From: ekn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

first of all, WAVx back in 1999 did not have revenues. secondly, wavx WAS backed by institutional ownership via a PP of 23 MM dollars from PGE, not to mention they had Peter Sprague NSM CEO of 20 yrs running the company and george Gilder on the board. and no officer sold a REDICULOUS amount of stock during the listing. Is that in the best interest of the shareholders? Is that fiduciary responsibility? Thirdly, I hope you are right. I hope edig does get it's nasdaq acceptance. That does not change my opinion that RP is at minimum, a VERY misleading officer. And again, I voluntarily said i hold a swing position in EDIG. My hope is that it runs UP again. I am far from a daytrader sir, as i said i am a self made millionaire through equity markets. and as far as freightened goes, I don't put all MY investment eggs in a VERY SPECULATIVE basket like you. As i said, 1 BAD event could equal ABSOLUTE disaster for this stock. until there are some SERIOUs bonafides this remains ONE helluva risk. As for me using more than 1 alias on RB, I think I AM in the majority. And from my own experience of using message boards, I KNOW DAM WELL that company officers post on MANY of them. So I use my own techniques to flush out those 'in the know".