Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (39491)	9/24/2000 2:01:22 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston	Respond to of 769667

Michael, it is hard to believe the Dems when it comes to health care spending. Uninsured children? Many villains here. AP Health-Science Report: 40 States To Forfeit Funds NEW YORK (AP) -- Forty states may have to give up hundreds of millions of dollars of federal money earmarked for health insurance for children in low-income families because they haven't used all their allotted funds, The New York Times reported Sunday. About 45 percent of the $4.2 billion provided in 1997 by Congress hasn't been spent by the states, state and federal officials said. Any money left after a Sept. 30 deadline will be redistributed to the 10 states that used their full allotments of federal money under the Children's Health Insurance Program, a program created by Congress in 1997. For Louisiana, that would mean giving up $63.7 million, or 63 percent of its allotment of $101.7 million. California and Texas -- which together have 29 percent of the nation's 11 million uninsured children -- stand to lose $590 million and $446.3 million, respectively. The states that have used all of their allotments -- Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and South Carolina -- will have one year to spend the extra money, after which it will revert to the Treasury. The Children's Health Insurance Program was designed to help children in families with too much income to qualify for Medicaid and too little to afford private insurance. Congress in 1997 committed to providing a total of $40 billion for the program nationwide over 10 years. States had three years beginning Oct. 1, 1997, to use the first year's installment of $4.2 billion. State officials say the program provides care to more than two million children while stimulating improvements in Medicaid. But spending has lagged behind expectations. Officials in 20 states say they encountered major problems implementing the program because in some cases it took more than a year to start enrollment; some states couldn't find enough eligible children, and others said the complex application procedure deterred enrollment. ''If we enrolled every single eligible child in Colorado, we still couldn't spend our full allocation of federal money. Our economy is doing so well, there are fewer eligible kids than what was estimated when the federal government did its initial allocation of money,'' said William N. Lindsay, head of the board that supervises the program in Colorado. Some states complained that the federal government administered the program in such a rigid, inflexible way that it prevented them from spending the money for children who might have benefited. ''The federal law and regulations provided New Mexico with a lot more money than we could possibly use,'' complained J. Barry Blitzer, deputy secretary of the Human Services Department in New Mexico. ''We have 30,000 uninsured kids, of whom no more than 1,000 are eligible for the new program.'' ^------< On the Net: hcfa.gov AP-NY-09-23-00 2331EDT< 09/23/2000 Newsday Classifieds Visit the Shops of LI They're trying to defeat the voucher here in Calif. by saying there are no private school openings for the lower income groups to access, therefore it will benefit only the parents who are already sending their kids to private school. Coalitions of private schools (mostly religious) claim they will meet the demand. Flap will be happy to know the teachers union is trying to assess my wife extra to fight the voucher.

To: greenspirit who wrote (39491)	9/24/2000 4:14:21 PM
From: Frank Griffin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Yes, if they think about it they are only holding the children back whose parents do not have substantial assets. The Gores and Clintons will and have utilized private schools and choice entirely for their children. Those who argue for status quo are saying allow only those who are privileged the opportunity to choose. Not fair for our children. Competition should enhance the quality of education in the public school system.