Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (21241)	9/24/2000 10:58:01 PM
From: KeepItSimple	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

>I do not justify the kid but I am fuming about those at the SEC that >overlook the big brokers, so that in the future they can get jobs and >hefty pay increases at WS related firms. I am shocked! Are you actually implying that low-paid workers at the SEC intentionally overlook white collar crime at the major brokerages so that they can get cushy high-paying jobs the millisecond they leave public service and enter the private sector? And furthermore, that those same employees intentionally target small time players like that kid, and tokyojoe, who offer no promise of kickbacks, just so they can appear to at least be _attempting_ some sort of fraud enforcement? Give me a break! What's next- you're gonna tell me that the price target of $1000 on QXLC wasn't backed up by actual research, and that the guy touting it on CNBC was busy unloading his firm's entire inventory? And there's no santa claus either, right? Pull my other leg!