SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JimC1997 who wrote (15155)9/25/2000 1:41:04 AM
From: Jon Tara  Respond to of 18366
 
"How does the fact that packers1 recounted three conversations that he had with Robert Putnam in his most recent 100 posts (which I pointed out to you, when you said that there were no conversations with Putnam in those posts) constitute my "lying" to you?"

It doesn't. Did you read the rest of my post?



To: JimC1997 who wrote (15155)9/25/2000 2:01:02 AM
From: ekn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18366
 
As i stated before, no officer of any company would dare post on any of their own message boards, conveinetly hyping up another 1 of the stocks they operate no less! No. Only bad guys and shorts post on message boards. you seem to get INCREDIBLY upset[you know your little girl name calling, very becoming of a 50 YO man by the way!] when someone says something detrimental about a VERY RISKY OTC penny stock that YOU have decided to dump your entire portfolio into. yes, i can see those CEO neurons gyrating. Funny with all of the dough you dumped into edig, followed by multiple public "predictions" of grand events that you have purported based on 0 fact, it could easily be interpreted that you have attempted to "manipulate" the edig stock price for your own gains. I'm not a p***y boy who would threaten to call the SEC sheriffs on ya,[i do however throw elbows in pick up basketball games] But you should say 10 hail mary's before you retire for the night. By the way the packers 1 today;>) and so did my jets. Love ya !
CHEERS



To: JimC1997 who wrote (15155)9/25/2000 2:01:07 AM
From: Jon Tara  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18366
 
Lies, damned lies, and statistics dept...

JimC wrote:

"By the way, Raging Bull reports that packers1 has posted a total of 1679 times. Of these, about 100 were on other stocks. That leaves the ratio of packers1 posts to Jon Tara posts at about 2 to 1, not 9 to 1."

First of all, you once again expose yourself in a lie. You yourself admit that only 100 out of 1679 posts - or about 0.6% of his posts - were to threads other than the EDIG thread.

Incidently, quite a number of those 100 posts that were made to other stock threads on RB were, in fact, about EDIG. He was touting EDIG on other threads. In fact, his very first post listed in his history is an EDIG tout to the WLGS thread. His second post is an EDIG tout to the IINN thread. Those are followed by 25 posts to the EDIG thread.

It is apparent that packers1 probably joined RB for the express purpose of touting EDIG, and had only a minor passing interest in any other stock.

Yet, you'd previously said:

"Nor did you note that packers1 has posted on a variety of stocks, so his total EDIG-related messages are probably not that many more than the 700(!!!!) or so Jon Tara EDIG messages since the end of January."

The number of posts that were made about a "variety of stocks" were, in fact, insignificant - 0.6%. Less than that, if you count the EDIG touts made on other boards.

A 2:1 ratio is hardly "not that many more".

Further, packers1's posting frequency has accelerated dramatically - to the point of having made 700 posts about EDIG within the past month. Think about it - you complain that I have posted so frequently here, yet packers1 has posted in ONE MONTH as many posts as I have made in 9 months. Shouldn't you be over on RB advising packers1 to tone it down and stop embarrasing EDIG shareholders?

I think you should give packers1 some of the medical advice you so like to so gladly hand out...