SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sylvester80 who wrote (55081)9/25/2000 11:48:59 AM
From: gnuman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Sylvester80 re: The i815 and PC133 kicked DDR's butt and you know it.
I don't see how you can make that statement. Except for the Intel benchmarks heavily oriented to SSE, the Athlon/PC1600 pretty much beat the PIII/i815E which beat the PIII/i820.
anandtech.com
Of course what we really need to see is a PIII/DDR chip set to make an apples to apples.
BTW, I agree that you reported the IDC numbers for work stations accurately.



To: sylvester80 who wrote (55081)9/25/2000 1:23:12 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Duplicate



To: sylvester80 who wrote (55081)9/25/2000 1:30:44 PM
From: Scumbria  Respond to of 93625
 
Sylvester,

The Athlon DDR system beat the Athlon PC133 system on all of the benchmarks.

The Athlon DDR system beat the PIII PC133 system on 7 out of 11 benchmarks. The other 4 were due to the fact that the PIII runs them faster than the Athlon.

Your assertion that PC133 is faster than DDR is absurd from either an empirical or a theoretical point of view. Is the problem here a lack of veracity or a lack of comprehension?

Scumbria


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News