SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (55101)9/25/2000 1:36:10 PM
From: Scumbria  Respond to of 93625
 
Michael,

I'm not talking about the more complicated issue of DDR vs. DRDRAM performance theory.

It is very simple to compare DDR266 vs. SDRAM133 performance. They both have the same latency, but DDR bandwidth is double. Obviously DDR is faster.

Scumbria



To: mishedlo who wrote (55101)9/25/2000 1:36:56 PM
From: chic_hearne  Respond to of 93625
 
Re: I believe there are alot of theoretical views that say DDR sucks and RDRAM is great, and of course vice versa.

mishedlo,

Isn't all of this irrelevant though?

The Dramurai have spoken. They are going to make SDRAM and DDR instead of DRDRAM. End of story. Nothing else matters.

chic


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News