Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldsheet who wrote (58909)	9/26/2000 10:03:41 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116811

Bob, interesting commentary on the "BIG GOLD CONSPIRACY"! Thanks

To: goldsheet who wrote (58909)	9/26/2000 9:03:21 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116811

Bob, Your excellent web site of goldsheet.simplenet.com remains one of a kind among many because it takes no side and lets the facts you gather "tell the story" as what has and is currently happening, along with enough information to help in the speculation of future events or trends. Clear to anyone who visits your Free to read, but don't Steal goldsheet is the seperation of your "Church & State" policy so that stuff like on this GPM thread do not clutter and reduce the use'ability of your site. You also have another seperation of "Company & Facts" policy in that only those advertisements you include to help pay for you time and cost in the site's overhead contain anything that can be biased or hype. You mentioned that your site will always be free to view it all, and if I am correct, it will always just present cold hard facts presented in ways to deliver more than one picture based on the tools available. Sounds good, but this may restrict your voice on this thread so that you do not express an opinion about a certain gold producing company that contains stuff outside the type you supply on your site. Simple good business practice so that all gold producers see your site via you as non judgemental outside mining numbers. Don't bash a company like I do towards Barrick, while it is ok to not defend Barrick, it is ok to mention that Barrick is not guilty of what I say until it is proven, and as such its just another company like all others with different numbers and procedures like hedging. You might also not do the opposite and bash GATA. They may win the battle. <<I need to get a list of companies who have contributed to GATA, so I can avoid investing in them ;) >> Best for the goldsheet not to take sides here because it would be easy for one to question the agenda of a web site that uses facts from sources that have been identified by GATA as helping the gold manipulators. No proof yet in the place of proven, but the Duck Test has already been used and the score was "off the chart" as in the needle was pinned to maximum Yes anti gold. d:o)g