Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: UnBelievable who wrote (21916)	9/26/2000 7:33:13 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Respond to of 436258

LOL! Sounds like Mama Bear's proposal..."If AMZN really cared about their employees, they'd buy 'em all POOTS" (instead of granting options)<G>

To: UnBelievable who wrote (21916)	9/26/2000 7:48:41 PM
From: pater tenebrarum	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 436258

i'm certain that's the case. first line of defense is the Greenspan put...that one is already being thrown into battle in the form of liquidity being supplied via the backdoor. the money supply growth explosion is certainly not a coincidence. if that doesn't help, the old suggestion to use the ESF to buy spoos directly will certainly be revived... considering that stock market trading exceeds GDP by a factor of approx. 3,5, that 50% of households are in the market and that the huge current account deficit depends on foreigners continued appetite for US financial assets for its financing, i am certain that the market is on politicians and sundry policy makers minds all the time. i don't believe for a second Greenspan's recent assertion that he has stopped worrying about this momentous bubble. too much depends on it. of course this way an ever bigger trap is being built...moral hazard at its finest.