Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (58945)	9/26/2000 11:01:04 PM
From: John Paquet	Respond to of 116759

Gore will lose this election, BUsh will win. Liberman tries to win both Senate seats and VP seat. This kind of double ambition will not do anyone good but FAIL. So Gore will lose this election. Dow will go down to 6,000 and Nasdaq will get tanked to 2,000 in short time fram. Gold $500 bucks. Gold figure. This kind of bearish outlook will wipe out all eqaulity holders who trust gore will winn but he will lose, Rarebird. John Paquet

To: Rarebird who wrote (58945)	9/26/2000 11:13:20 PM
From: John Paquet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116759

Rarebird; There five e's in the market place that so disturbed the equity market Dow down down down. 1. election--Gore will lose 2. energy cost oil crisis 3. earning {POOR}like QuaDark, INTel, many others down fail to meet the forecast 4.euro dollar and conserted intervention--US dollar crisis, US dollar big tumble. 5.economic model of Alan Greenspan totally failed. Alan tolk loudly about his PRODUCTIVITY MODEL which hold up price nicely, but it failed tatally and eventually, Just look at NASAQ down to 3,600 again today, from that hecty5,300. you see These five e's will crash you, will crash equity market and will shine GOLD. God bless you Rarebird--You deserve it badly right now. John Paquet 5. 5. 5. 4.

To: Rarebird who wrote (58945)	9/27/2000 10:53:40 AM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116759

From the writings of Sir Edward Coke in the 1520's England thru today,this has been very near the meaning of the term monopoly: Monopoly Control by one or a few companies of the manufacture, sale, distribution, or price of something. A monopoly may be prohibited if, for example, a company deliberately drives out competition. Oran's Dictionary of the Law lawoffice.com Monopoly A commercial advantage enjoyed by only one or a select few companies in which only those companies can trade in a certain area. Some monolopoies are legal, such as those temporarily created by patents. Others are secretly built by conspiracy between two or more companies and are prohibited by law. duhaime.org You will note that the direction of the manipulation is not that which places it outside the law, rather the sole fact undoes competition. Thus when Clinton sold oil from the strategic reserves(as a bonus to Gore) to OXY, into a soft market, he broke(at the very least) this law. Does not the same finding apply to those selling excessive paper gold into this soft market so as to control price? As to Bush "selling his soul" to the moral majority, were you running against a sitting VP(who has proven to take the public's money)would you turn away any money? Is money evil or only what it might buy? The question will be if those donations have put him at odds with the law or the public good or if they buy legal change or additional consideration? This can only be answered after the fact, we know what was bought & sold via donations under Gore/Clinton. There is little such proof in the recent history of Texas under Bush.