Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (55420)	9/27/2000 11:42:27 AM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Zeev, and could claim so when asked by nosy reporters (and frankly it is none of their business) The twist in this story is that this is the first time a lawsuit was allowed to proceed against a sitting president. The sexual harrassment lawsuit was allowed to go ahead rather than be back-burnered until he left office. In a sexual harrassment lawsuit, you can ask the "boss" about his sexual behavior within the office to determine whether there is a climate or history of unwanted sexual pursuit to determine whether that creates a "hostile" work environment or impedes promotions. So it was the lies in a court that are the issue, not the lies to reporters. Also, I don't know how much latitude there is, but I believe that the defense can also look into the sexual history of the "employee". Dave