SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Doughboy who wrote (39984)9/27/2000 1:21:33 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
It is not a stimulus unless aggregate spending increases out of synch with growth. There is no gasoline on the bonfire. Additionally, one doesn't know how much private debt will be retired as a result, since people are worried about out of kilter consumer credit. Finally, if one sets too much aside for deficit reduction, then there is a sudden decrease in the money supply relative to the growth rate, which threatens deflation. Further, if there is a sudden reduction in aggregate demand, as would happen if a most of the surplus were set aside, there would be a recession. The safest thing is gradual debt reduction, which is the Bush plan. The bias, after that, is in favor of letting people keep their money.......



To: Doughboy who wrote (39984)9/27/2000 1:31:56 AM
From: greenspirit  Respond to of 769667
 
Greenspan didn't warn about a tax cut. He specifically said (when asked) a tax cut would be preferable to more government spending.

Greenspan did say recently, however, that releasing America's strategic oil reserves was a mistake.

Gore has proposed over 2.2 TRILLION dollars of new spending so far. He never saw a rainy-day fund he didn't want to spend on a new government program.