Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Barrick Gold (ABX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nickel61 who wrote (2136)	9/27/2000 12:01:39 PM
From: goldsheet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3558

> why are eigty percent of the United States Foreign Exchange Reserves in GOLD Was around 50% the last time I checked. Book was something like 11B out of 66B, but gold was booked at 42.22 Market would be 71B out of 126B, 56%. I do not know why, but I think you would be concerned that 261 million ounces of US government gold could be used to manipulate the gold markets. They could distribute 1 ounce to each US citizen in order to eliminate this concentration of power. This would allow the common man to "vote" on the monetary value of gold: they could either hold it as a store of value or convert into fiat currency to buy beer and cigarettes <g>

To: nickel61 who wrote (2136)	9/27/2000 7:47:27 PM
From: russet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3558

<<<I think you should understand that the only thing aside from gold used to back the validity of any countries currencies is debt. That is all other foreign reserves are the debt instruments of another country or their currency in the form of their treasury notes or bonds. When these are suddenly called into question AND THERE IS NO GOLD IN YOUR FOREIGN RESERVES there is no backing behind your currency at all. NOthing.>>> Gold has only the value we humans give it. It is valueless in nature. Your above argument makes no sense to me. The economic output of goods and services from a country is what backs that country's debt, and it's currency. That is a direct measure of the ability of it's citizens to repay it's debts. The amount of gold and other currencies a country keeps in reserve is a miniscule amount in comparison to it's economic output, and it's debts, at least in most countries today. That reserve is only kept for a rainy day. I doubt its presence gives any country confidence that another country can repay it's debt. When you or I go for a loan, the lending institution looks at our ability to repay that loan more than our asset position. If they only looked at our reserves, few people could get a loan. There is no need for gold to be a reserve currency. Most countries have seen that, and acted to reduce their reserves of the stuff because it costs a lot of money to keep it around (storage, insurance, security). A country's best "reserve", is the ability of that country's people to produce goods and services the rest of the world wants.