Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (111528)	9/27/2000 12:35:05 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 186894

Re: "I was not aware that Intel officially released any benchmark results for either Pentium 4 or for Itanium yet. Can you point me to those web sites which published those official benchmark scores?" I've asked him repeatedly for this but to no avail. Maybe you'll have better luck. EP

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (111528)	9/27/2000 1:12:24 PM
From: pgerassi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Dear Tench: On this page there are two benchmarks (demos really) but the second claims that a P4 at 1.4G is better than an 800M P3 at MPEG Encoding. The results are on www1.anandtech.com page. If this is not deseminating a benchmark, what is? On this page Intel deseminated benchmarks for an unreleased CPU (Xscale StrongARM): www1.anandtech.com Here is a reference to WME where 1.5G P4 is faster than a 1G P3 (and Intel published it): www6.tomshardware.com This page tries to put this into perspective: www6.tomshardware.com Here are three examples of Intel deseminating performance numbers on unreleased CPUs, one of which tells that Intel published this benchmark (WME). The last example proves Elmer to be a liar and obviously in error. Pete