Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Wind River going up, up, up! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lkj who wrote (8555)	9/28/2000 8:35:43 AM
From: Ramsey Su	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10309

newsalert.com

To: lkj who wrote (8555)	11/25/2000 10:22:56 AM
From: Peter Church	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10309

>>>How does IxWorks impact EMC's products?>>> I asked myself the same question, especially watching NTAP's long slide down the chute this month. Was the market telling the company that it's game is ending? Of course, the stock was priced beyond perfection and the NSDAQ went looking for blood. That was not intrinsic to the company. Still, I find it hard to reconcile that no one I read has mentioned the I2O threat to the established NAS companies. What do you think? Maybe from this perspective, NTAP and EMC are obvious shorts. quote.yahoo.com

To: lkj who wrote (8555)	11/25/2000 9:24:06 PM
From: Bill Fischofer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10309

Re: IxWorks and Storage I wouldn't count on I2O being a terribly big source of revenue for WIND. Unfortunately I2O seems a day late and a dollar short because just as it is starting to roll out the entire market for server-attached-storage is collapsing. At the enterprise level storage is rapidly becoming a network service and the strategic attachment interface that is emerging is gigabit ethernet (although fibre channel will remain very important for some years to come). To understand what is happening with storage one need only look at what happened with networking and timeshift things by a decade. In the 1980s networks were considered part of a computer's I/O subsystem and proprietary networking schemes like IBM's SNA and Digital's DECNet dominated the landscape. Then along came companies like CSCO and the rise of a processor-independent network called the Internet which started to take over all of the old processor-centric networking schemes. Few today doubt that eventually the Internet will subsume all other networks. Similarly, in the 1990s storage was considered a "peripheral" to the computer. But like networking before it, companies like EMC and NTAP saw things differently. Storage began to evolve away from the processor into a separate external service. We're still in the early stages of this evolution, but by 2005 the idea of processors "owning" and "operating" storage will seem as antique as the idea of them "owning" and "operating" networks does today. The ultimate effect of this transition is that we are moving from a processor-centric IT worldview to a storage-centric one. Formerly the processor reigned at the center of the enterprise and storage was literally a "peripheral". Under the new paradigm these roles are reversed and the storage network moves to the center while processors become the new peripheral to the storage network. This theme has been elaborated extensively on the EMC thread and those interested in exploring it further can continue discussion on this topic there. It's main impact on WIND will be that I2O will likely be irrelevant to WIND's future revenue and earnings potential.