Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (32925)	9/27/2000 10:57:44 PM
From: robwin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35685

Hi Bonnie, It didn't take long for the troops to rally to the cause...in bold capital letters no less... By the way, got a hot tip for you, buy as many INTC January 60 calls as you can get your hands on...it's a screaming buy at these prices... Selah.. Robtaire :)

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (32925)	9/28/2000 12:20:23 AM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 35685

Hi b-i-a, Could you do me a favor? First, please read the following from your post to Dealer (# 32925)..... "How about these additional 'qualifiers:' #21. No one is allowed to 'voice' <g> the slightest skepticism about Tom's (Voltaire) 'ideas.' #22. The use of profanity is limited exclusively to Tom. Or to Jim Willie CB. No one else is permitted to use 'profane words' NOR 'profane images.' Particularly females. Simply NOT ALLOWED. #23. All female posters on the board must post in OBVIOUS subjugation to the 'dominant males.' Should that require groveling and feigned ignorance, so be it. <g> Always does, now ain't that right? From 'acceptable' females. <snicker> " Could you point me to the post(s) where these rules were instituted? I believe that those rules, as you described them were never in effect on this thread. In fact, I believe that I have already provided both you & robwin (via PM) a short list of links & sources that seem to prove that your #21 is simply a huge load of BS. It concerns me that you seem to ignore the real history of the porch & you wish to create your own version of events..... regardless of the facts. Regarding your #22...... I don't recall that rule being instituted in the manner you claim it to be..... got a link(s) to back it up? FWIW, I have used profanities (jackass, damn, hell) a few times for sure..... would you like a link, or is my word sufficient...... that sort of conflicts with your version of the truth, doesn't it? I believe others have used similar profanities as well...... However,, there just weren't many incidents of the use of profanities on the porch.... well..... there was that period when you were repeatedly using George Carlin's 7 words that can't be said on TV..... I believe you were trying to see if the SI police would go after you..... regarding #23...... hmmm....I was never let in on that rule on the porch b-i-a..... got a link to refresh my memory? BTW, You have claimed I am on the Board of directors at the new porch..... does that qualify me for 'dominant male' status? ummmm.... if so, the females aren't following that one with me.... & that includes you <gg>.... in fact, I have had some good debates with several women who did not agree with me.... FWIW, there was no subjugation.... just debate. I'll tell you what b-i-a..... provide me links to support your allegations.... there certainly must be some solid evidence to support your bold claims & allegations...... I'll be glad to continue provide links to support the written version of events here.... but for now, I'd like you to come up with a series of links to validate your recent claims...... .......or are you really just making misleading statements, with intentional deceit & blatant lying, while you make baseless personal attacks against Tom & others in order to push your personal agenda? My bet is you are re-writing history using these disgusting methods. Prove me wrong..... please Ö¿Ö