Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (111656)	9/28/2000 11:26:03 AM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Respond to of 186894

Mr. Tucker, Are you a securities lawyer? I fear your postings lead me to the conclusion that you are not. For purposes of discussion, I should inform you that I personally have done a great deal of research on this issue, and have also received legal counsel from two separate private practice attorneys who specialize in this field, as well as two officials at the Securities and Exchange Commission, both attorneys in the Division of Enforcement, who have confirmed this to me over the telephone personally. They are: Susan Mathews, Senior Counsel, Division of Enforcement, District of Columbia Office, Securities and Exchange Commission Lindsey H. Simon, Staff Attorney, Division of Enforcement, Chicago District Office, Securities and Exchange Commission In future, you may wish to research your material in advance of taking these witless risks making foolish public statements. You may reiterate misinformation a thousand times and it will remain of no consequence. Undisclosed order flow is completely illegal. The fact that it is not disclosed to clients makes it illegal. The firms you name disclose their immoral order flow to their clients, and those clients are required by law to sign documents acknowledging full understanding and acceptance of this practice. Sincerely, Olivier L. F. Asser