SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Les H who wrote (22662)9/28/2000 2:03:48 PM
From: SeaViewer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
2/3 is a much better way, like in California...



To: Les H who wrote (22662)9/28/2000 2:11:35 PM
From: LLCF  Respond to of 436258
 
<One would think a very significant plurality would be needed to implement these kinds of big decisions, such as new taxes. >

You mean like in the U.S.??? ROFL

DAK



To: Les H who wrote (22662)9/28/2000 2:30:24 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Respond to of 436258
 
yes, it's strange. anyway, we know how to deal with Danish no votes...we give them a few weeks/months to cool off, and then let them vote again, until we get the desired result...

that's how it works over here...



To: Les H who wrote (22662)9/28/2000 2:34:09 PM
From: Don Lloyd  Respond to of 436258
 
Les -

[Hard to believe 50.01% of a population can drag the other 49.9% into doing something as significant as changing monies. Or not. One would think a very significant plurality would be needed to implement these kinds of big decisions, such as new taxes.]

What happened to the missing 0.09%? Shot while trying to escape?

Regards, Don