SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jason W who wrote (32529)9/28/2000 3:07:01 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 54805
 
Jason, I think that most of the people here are

1) Buying the solid Gorillas and Kings

2) Putting some money in the lower cap "up and comers"

The large, large, Caps will not give us 5 or 10 baggers, in 2 or three years, but I am would be happy as a clam with 30% a year, if I can get it from them for a while.

The trouble with the basket of "Shiny Pebbles", IMO, is that the ones you take a bath on can kill the big gainers.

It is also a matter of age. If I was 35, I would take a lot more risk.

We are all doing the best we can, and that is better that is usually better than the bulk of the investors do.

If this thread had been around in '93, and I had found it, I would have sure made a lot more money, faster!



To: Jason W who wrote (32529)9/28/2000 3:42:49 PM
From: drew_m  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Jason,

Your post perfectly described where my thinking has been lately.

I am quite sure that those with 7 figure ports invested in some shiny pebbles, along they way.

This thread has helped me understand the importance of IPR and the value chain. When I look at my port I see several Market caps above 150B. I will probably be replacing those companies in the near future, OCT/NOV time frame.

The frustrating thing with waiting on the tornado's is that they may never occur, and their in lies the risk.

Thanks for posting your thoughts, If I were a betting man, I would speculate that many other lurkers are in a similar boat.

Thanks for posting Jason.

/me back to lurk.

Drew



To: Jason W who wrote (32529)9/28/2000 3:55:02 PM
From: StockHawk  Respond to of 54805
 
>>This idea may not fly with some people here, but for those with larger sums to invest, a stomach for increased risk, and confidence in their "shiny pebble" picks, their may be a place for such investing, parallel to the Gorilla Game. I recall BB, or someone else possibly, looking into Off Road Capital and other venture type funds. If those types of opportunties are being considered by others on this board, than an "aggessive shiny pebble" portfolio may be an option also.<<

Jason, a few comments:

First, there is a world of difference between some of the companies discussed here that may be called "shiny pebbles" and the kinds of companies that one might find through a source such as Off Road Capital, which is focusing on pre-IPO companies. While new discussion boards are created every day, I can't see serious discussion developing on this board about such ventures. I do see the appeal of such an apporach, and apparently the GG authors did too. One of the authors was heavily involved in ICGE, and that company was mentioned favorably by Moore on several occasions. After closing just above $12 on its IPO last August it raced up to a high of $212 on 12/22 and it closed at $200 on 1/3/00 (the same day QCOM hit $200). Today it trades in the teens, not too far above its IPO price.

One of the nice parts of following G&K stocks is that such a small number qualify. If you wish to pick the diamonds out of the pebbles, suddenly you have hundreds of companies to look at.

Now that I have you thinking that I am totally negative regarding your suggestion, let me tell you that I am not. I think ongoing discussions about companies Slightly earlier in their development would be a benefit. The examples you sited, CREE, WIND and SNDK are quite good. I think other companies, perhaps the ones that the press sometimes refers to as "New Market Leaders" might be worth discussing. Networkers such as JNPR, SCMR or EXTR come to mind.

One of the ideas behind the Hunt Reports was to troll for younger companies with the right genes. Unfortunately, the NASDAQ's decline may have reduced the interest level in this pursuit. Perhaps Don's wonderful Wind posts will breath new life into the Hunt.

I will be interested to see what other comments your post generates.

StockHawk



To: Jason W who wrote (32529)9/28/2000 5:13:56 PM
From: k_maxwell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 54805
 
Jason W -- that was a great post.

I too have put a significant percentage of my invested assets in "shiny pebbles" -- CREE, AVNX and LNOP (recent Gilder pick) for example. I do presently like certain of the gorillas and kings -- I was lucky to get into UNPH before it was JDSU, but I almost completely missed the boat on QCOM in 1999 (other than a few short term trades, I didn't ride it up, didn't ride it down).

I have recently decided that basically, where Moore's gorilla and king framework intersects with Gilder's page 8 Telecosm table is where I feel most comfortable investing the bulk of my money. Note that CSCO, INTC, MSFT and ORCL (the old "4 horsemen") are not on Gilder's list. JDSU and QCOM are his two most celebrated companies. SUNW has been on the list from the outset (1996). NT is there, as is CIEN.

Like you, compared to the silverhairs on this thread, I am relatively young -- 31 years old. I have been actively investing my own money since high school.

While investing in non-gorillas and non-kings may be anathema to the entire premise behind gorilla gaming, the metrics laid out by Moore and expanded upon by the participants of this thread do set up a tantalizing framework for potentially identifying future kings and pongids. Shiny pebbles. Gorilla game blasphemy, I know.

The whole technology cycle has accelerated so much, so fast in the last year and a half, that it becomes difficult to be a "long term buy and hold" investor, no matter how good the company. Look at LU and INTC, and even CSCO, all of which I believe are presently under siege. I would not be comfortable tucking any stock away for 2 or 3 years right now without checking the price regularly.

Here's a question for the thread: Can Christiensen's disruptive technolgies theories be adequately reconciled with Moore LTBH gorilla gaming? Another huge wrench in the gorilla game theory, of course, as we have seen, is the enforcement of antitrust law (MSFT).

So, in a nutshell, I guess I'll take Gilder's list, cross-pollinate it with some gorilla game theory, always with my eyes on disruptions from below and an overeager DOJ/FTC.

Just some ramblings from a lurker. I love this thread. Talk about the power of a network. I bet there are 50 to 100 non-paying lurkers for every paying contributor, and believe me, some of them are managing a lot of other people's money here in Gotham. Oh, and by the way, Don Mosher's series on WIND was incredible. Count me in. kirk



To: Jason W who wrote (32529)9/28/2000 7:33:55 PM
From: Bruce Brown  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 54805
 
I recall BB, or someone else possibly, looking into Off Road Capital and other venture type funds. If those types of opportunties are being considered by others on this board, than an "aggessive shiny pebble" portfolio may be an option also.

Yes, I asked on this thread during the summer if anybody knew about a couple of VC firms that had sent me their information. I'm not a resident of the U.S. at the moment, so I don't qualify. One of the VC firms allowed investors to choose which ventures the capital should be directed. That appeared interesting to me, but I don't know much more than that. I'll probably look into it again once we live in the states if I'm still interested with a small amount of money being used in that manner.

The Gorillas with market caps of $150B or so and up will not turn into the 5 or 10 baggers that I am hoping to invest in. I fully understand the risk associated with buying "shiny pebbles", but to make it past the minds that be here on the G&K thread, combined with my own DD and gut instincts, I choose to follow this path. This is not to say that I don't own some larger caps.

That is a common theme on investing message boards. It seems like it's rare to find a small-cap like i2, Siebel or Dell these days. It seems like if you do find one, they IPO as a smaller mid-cap or get there fairly quickly after the IPO (like by lunch time). As examples, this happened with Brocade, Redback, Juniper, Ariba, CommerceOne, Foundry, Sycamore, Ciena and some others in the past year or two.

Does a 10 bagger feel good? It sure does. It looks like Apple is back to a 3 bagger total after 15 years of being a traded company. Rather than concentrating on bagging some baggers, I think it is more prudent to concentrate on investing in a good business first using the gorilla game criteria. The bags will take care of themselves. You can make a hell of a lot of money over your investing career with a 15 - 20% annual return. Let me borrow a little information from the Fool about teaching your children to invest:

fool.com

=====
For instance, if a child invests $100 of birthday money at the age of 15, the long-term results are impressive. The following table shows a few different growth rates: 5% is the anticipated return if that $100 is invested in a money market account or bonds; 10% is the average return rate of the stock market; 15% is a little better than the average stock market return; and 20% is the return a knowledgeable, aggressive investor might see.


Age 5% 10% 15% 20%
15 $100 $100 $100 $100
20 $128 $161 $201 $249
25 $163 $259 $405 $619
30 $208 $418 $814 $1,541
40 $339 $1,083 $3,292 $9,540
50 $552 $2,810 $13,318 $59,067
60 $899 $7,289 $53,877 $365,726
65 $1,147 $11,739 $108,366 $910,044


That little $100 bill would have become more than 9,000 hundred-dollar bills ($910,000) at age 65 with a 20% return. Now that's a return worth waiting for!
=====

Although we would all like to have a quick 5 or 10 bagger, one should really focus on the long term accumulation and compounding of great companies. If you are patient, you will find a grand slam like Dell, i2, Siebel, Network Appliance, etc... every now and then to make it all worth while.

Although I hit the big 39 on the 20th of this month, I still consider myself young and have plenty more investing years to go. Enough to invest a portion of my money in younger companies to balance out the mix with the more mature large-caps. You see how 'stable' a stock like Intel can be? &lt;ggg&gt; There's a company that, even with the revenue shortfall, will still come in at 17 - 19% y/y revenue growth this quarter as a 30 year old company. That's fine by me. I've also got some that will come in at 300 to 500%+ y/y this quarter as well.

Are there some small-caps available at the moment that appear to be playing in a gorilla game? Are there upcoming IPO's that appear to be playing in a gorilla game? Are there companies with a market cap between $5 and $25 Billion that appear to be playing in a gorilla game? Most likely you would be able to turn up something in one of those areas that just might be worthy of consideration. You've seen what two of the younger G&K portfolio members - Siebel and Network Appliance - have done since going public not too many years ago. There will be others. The W&W list has some very compelling companies, but is not an all exclusive list of possibilities.

BB