SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MythMan who wrote (22712)9/28/2000 4:40:43 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Respond to of 436258
 
Looks like the book-cookers perform a RIMM job:

QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

For the three months ended August 31
(in US$ thousands, except
for earnings per share) Fiscal 2001 Fiscal 2000
(unaudited)

Revenue $42,521 $19,278
Cost of sales 25,377 10,775
------------------------
17,144 8,503
------------------------

Research and development, net of government
assistance of $1,519 (2000 -$1,138) 3,816 1,681
Selling, marketing and administration 15,664 3,019
Amortization 1,891 887
------------------------
21,371 5,587
------------------------

Income (loss) from operations (4,227) 2,916

Investment income 3,102 656

------------------------
Income (loss) before provision for taxes (1,125) 3,572

Provision for income taxes 500 1,250
------------------------

Net income (loss) $(1,625) $2,322
------------------------
------------------------

Earnings (loss) per share, basic $(0.02) $0.03
Earnings (loss) per share, fully diluted $(0.02) $0.03
------------------------------------------------------------------------
See accompanying notes.


So with the help of the ubiquitous "investment income", RIMM
manages to beat expectations (all together now): "BY ONE
CENT"! ROTFLMAO!!! And look, it was investment inc. was 450%
greater than last year! Yep, they'll do that year after
year....NOT!<G>



To: MythMan who wrote (22712)9/28/2000 4:42:23 PM
From: Lucretius  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
LOL!! GFY...

Message 14475885

along those same lines... i think this says its time to start selling again...



To: MythMan who wrote (22712)9/28/2000 4:44:59 PM
From: bill meehan  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 436258
 
Well...I won't step into that, but I need help from ALL.

Looking for a '66 or '67 Shelby Mustang GT-500. Would be grateful if anyone can suggest links, etc to find one. I've checked lots of web sites but no luck so far. (This Internet thing will be great once somebody has it organized in a more useful manner--might even improve my personal productivity.) TIA