Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: da_cheif™ who wrote (7536)	9/28/2000 8:31:08 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Yes sir, give me the choice of the momentary embarassment of issuing a 'retraction' on a stock I've held no position in for months and spending a significant amount of cash on attornies fees in a lawsuit. Hmm, do I spend $__,___ or let the simple minded who think that a forced retraction is worth the paper it's printed on have a few laughs and say a couple of meaningless 'I told you so's'. Hmm, tough one. Regards, Barb

To: da_cheif™ who wrote (7536)	9/28/2000 9:26:25 PM
From: Eddy Blinker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

da_cheif aka Wolanchuk: Are you not a charlatan of magnitude? You and your side kick poster CHIS should be scrutinised beyond the usual stare,because ever since you joined SI your postings follow a methodic stock promotion scheme.My humble opinion only. I was advised to say. Your chummy ways and the continuous display of your worldly possessions are IMO designed to induce and lure newbies and the unaware SI member on various threads to follow your promotions of certain stocks, like OTCBB.WAVC. Are you in any way connected to the CEO Mr. Bruce Sinclair or his Canadian Company? Do you or your telephone service wolanchuk.com receive any financial rewards for promoting this company to the members of SI? Regards, ED PS.I don`t want to offend but I seriously question your credibility. I regard one pretentious "LONG" 1000 times worse as one Bill Wexler.

To: da_cheif™ who wrote (7536)	9/29/2000 11:56:33 AM
From: Hank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

How do you know this? Either way, I just love how the saber rattling on these threads is only in one direction. I wonder what would have happened if Bill had been correct. Would attornies be forcing retractions from longs? Would people be screaming for "damages" and dismissal from SI from anybody who posted positive opinions on VLNC? I think not. That's what makes these threads such a pathetic twisted joke that defies the concept of freedom of speech. Only the longs are allowed to speak. Everyone else is evil and should be sued. What a joke.