Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Fuel Cells -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Oravetz who wrote (179)	9/29/2000 1:34:21 PM
From: H James Morris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196

Jim, thanks for the link. It just reminds me of the .coms. Fortunes were made before the .com bubble burst. I'm hoping the fuel cell mania won't be any different.;-) Btw I do feel Fuel Cell technology is here to stay. Compared to selling books, pet food, and groceries over the Internet.

To: Jim Oravetz who wrote (179)	10/8/2000 1:16:38 PM
From: H James Morris	Respond to of 196

>A Gore administration, as the candidate indicated in the debate last week, would try to develop a new kind of energy industry. Gore would grant tax credits for hybrid cars and trucks powered by both gasoline and electricity. His administration would support tax credits for new kinds of electrical motors and home and commercial heating and cooling systems. The environmental industry also would receive a new emphasis in a Gore administration. Gore would use tax credits to support fuel cell development and new water resource systems. "There would be programs for resource productivity, the reuse of water and land and many other resources," says Grant Ferrier, head of Environmental Business International, a San Diego consulting firm and publisher of environmental newsletters. This would be good news for companies such as Vivendi, Cadiz, Ballard Power Systems and FuelCell Energy. A Gore administration would support research in energy and environmental ideas that first surfaced in the oil-short 1970s, with the difference being that technology has improved in the intervening decades and there is more money around today. The paradox of this election is that the effect in the short term will be business as usual, but in the next four or eight years the outcome could change the course of the economy.