Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Voltaire who wrote (4594)	9/29/2000 8:54:58 PM
From: Jim Willie CB	Respond to of 65232

not only you stunned by such ignorance I am stunned aoubt how the entire reporting media is not aware? NYTimes, InvBusDaily, Barrons, BusWeek, CNBC, CNNfn I doubt Willow Bay is fooled she is the sharpest of the bunch looking forward to catching her daily on CNNfn in Florida not available daily on TV up here north of the border among Yankees CNBC could cause quite a controversy if they did a solid "60Minutes"-like report on broker analyst manipulation, paid 2nd tier reports, rumor attack during quiet defenseless quiet period, etc / Jim

To: Voltaire who wrote (4594)	9/29/2000 9:07:59 PM
From: Voltaire	Respond to of 65232

THIS WAS THE FELLOW: Re: I hope he's wrong sotiris_k1 9/29/00 4:18 pm I am very relaxed, i just express what every decent observing person has noticed by now about all those superidiots parading cnbc and the other media with their mediocre long term returns and poor education that is so obvious from their statements and their audacity to guide the masses to massively wrong long term decisions. What is the logic of not buying intel here? That it will do what ? Go to 30? If intel can go to 30 and this proves to be a valid argument because the entire economy goes to hell what do you think will happen to csco, sunw, orcl and their other precisous choices of momentum bs. Intel today at close stands the most oversold it has ever been in 15-20 years. Its also the stronger in fundamentals as well as capacity to define its own future that it has ever been before. And it is treated so poorly. The reason intel is so badly treated is deep and it has to do with what will ultimately take the us economy and stock market to 0 unless some sanity steps in. When you can massively ignore logic and produce such declines for the best of your companies (intel is the number 1 earnings machine in nasdaq) then everything else that has 1/3 and 1/5th and 1/10th of the earnings of intel will face market saturatiosn and stock price collapse well before it could ever reach the size of fundamentsals intel enjoys. Therefore choosing to extend the unbelievable asymmetry in treatment of intel vs the others is only going to make the fall of others way more unthinkable than intel is doing now. This market is now ran by morons, its totally destablized , has lost all sense of purpose and is actually a valid long term argument against investing. It is so paranoid. What has occured to intel the past 18 month is enough to convince anyone against long term investing (that doesnt involve hedging i mean) and this is a very scary argument against the survival of the very stock market. When such massive paranoia can set in and nobody dares to oppose to it you know that : 1) either the system is at massive long term bottom 2) or participating into it has become a roulette. I maintain current intel treatment is totally wrong. Those that were negative on intel at 75 were the same people that were negative at 20 and those that are negative now suddenly ,were quite happy at 75. If momentum is the game they want to play then they will one day find out that the momentum that takes you to 0 is the most fascinating ride of them all. In the end its momentum that takes all their fancy choices down crashing 80% . Shall we all now review mr. Cramer's brilliant internet past choices as well as monday night quarterback action?