SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike Buckley who wrote (32625)9/30/2000 3:02:56 AM
From: saukriver  Respond to of 54805
 
I haven't looked under the hood (as Bruce would say) of Apple Computer, but I gotta wonder if the stock isn't a wonderful opportunity in the form of a traditional value play combined with the strength of a niche-dominating chimp. (Only gorillas are more powerful than niche-dominating chimps.) After today's debacle, the price of the stock is barely more than two times cash and equivalents and only two times book value.

Could be. Or, it could be that its overpriced products just are not selling. Apple analysts were peeved on the tv this evening about the inexplicable nature of the sales shortfall.



To: Mike Buckley who wrote (32625)9/30/2000 3:29:58 AM
From: ratan lal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
the price of the stock is barely more than two times cash and equivalents and only two times book value.


Not to mention a p/e of 26 and a p/s of 1 .



To: Mike Buckley who wrote (32625)9/30/2000 4:40:29 AM
From: hueyone  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 54805
 
Re: reminds me of the good old days when an investor could really find undervalued stocks using traditional metrics.

SSTI---Hypergrowth at a Bargain Price

SST is still firing on all cylinders. Three days ago the company pre announced third quarter earnings and revenue growth that exceed 45% on a sequential quarter basis.

The company expects to report third quarter revenue of greater than $150 million, or an increase of greater than 45 percent over the second quarter of 2000 and greater than 325 percent over the third quarter a year ago. In addition, the company expects to report earnings per share for the third quarter of 2000 to be greater than $0.35.

biz.yahoo.com

The more I find out about SST, the more I like the company. A preliminary, mini hunt report follows:

1. Open Proprietary Architecture. There is no question SST has a well received open proprietary architecture based on its patented Superflash technology. SST has patented both the production process of Superflash as well as the end Superflash product. SST offers its SuperFlash technology for embedded applications through its world-class manufacturing partners and technology licensees such as Apacer, Analog Devices, ATMI, IBM, ISD, National Semiconductor, Motorola, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., SANYO Electric Co., Ltd., Seiko Epson Corp., TSMC-Acer Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TASMC) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSMC).

2. More on Superflash. SST's SuperFlash technology is a NOR type, split-gate cell architecture which uses a reliable thick-oxide process with fewer manufacturing steps resulting in a low-cost, nonvolatile memory solution with excellent data retention and higher reliability. Superflash also has advantages in supporting low-power consumption and the ability to shrink feature sizes with new processes.

3. Superflash is Scalable. There have been questions as to what SST will do for an encore should low density flash requirements move up to higher densities. I have called the SST CFO about this issue, and was told in no uncertain terms that Superflash is scalable. SST management has consistently maintained the position that Superflash will maintain its advantages as die sizes shrink and low densities move up.

4. Superflash is Leveragable. SST is leveraging Superflash in to a wide array of products. SST offers over 50 products based on the SuperFlash design and manufacturing process technology. Here is SST's latest product announcement:

SST Targets New Dual-Bank Flash Memory Device for Embedded Applications in Internet-Ready Mobile Phones and PDAs

biz.yahoo.com

Here is an earlier example of SST leveraging Superflash in to a more complex product:

siliconinvestor.com

5. Discontinuous Innovation. Superflash technology may not meet a rigorous definition of a discontinuous innovation. It could be argued that the technology is a significant continuous innovation--- a la Juniper's router. Regardless of where one places Superflash on the continuum from continuous to discontinuous innovation, I still believe SSTI is a compelling investment opportunity.

6. Target Market. Although SST's market used to be primarily PC BIOS, now their target market is all smart devices with embedded technology. As a Wind River shareholder, I have an appreciation for the enormous potential of the embedded technology market.

7. First Mover Advantage. SST does not appear to have much competition in its core business---embedded low density code storage. This is a low margin business for most flash producers, but it is a high margin business for SST because of the cost advantage inherent in producing Superflash products. SST is the leader in this space.

8. Industry Standard. SSTI has a very good shot at becoming the industry standard for low density code storage.

9. High Switching Costs. In so much as OEM's design Superflash patented production technology in to their production processes, the switching costs may be high. However, I am not certain how best to evaluate the switching cost issue at this time.

10. Strong Value Chain. In addition to the manufacturing partners and technology licensees named in #1 above, the following information is available: In digital consumer products, SST provides memory components for consumer companies including Canon, Datel, Freetron, GSL, IDT, Panasonic, Sanyo, Samsung, Siemens, Sony, TiVo and Xerox. In networking, SST provides memory components for 3Com, Cisco, E-tech, Intel, Lucent, Nortel and Xircom. In wireless communications, SST provides products for companies including Kirks, Lucent, Maxon, QCOM, RTX, Siemens and VTech. In Internet computing, SST provides a wide array of memory components for companies including Acer, Apple, Asustek, Compal, Compaq, Dell, FIC, Gigabyte, Mitac, NEC and Quanta. Other customers include Arima, Diamond Multimedia, Infineon, Inventec, Lg and Liteon.

SST's products are manufactured at leading wafer foundries and semiconductor manufacturers including Samsung Electronics, Sanyo, Seiko-Epson, TSMC and UMC. SST also works with IBM, Samsung Electronics, Sanyo, Seiko-Epson and TSMC to develop new technology for manufacturing SST products.

11. Barriers to Entry. SST's biggest barrier to entry is its superior proprietary Superflash technology. If another company can design a lower cost solution with a smaller footprint, lower power consumption and higher reliability, it could supplant SST's Superflash technology. I am not aware that any company has designed such a solution, although I am aware of one competing company that makes grandiose claims with little or no market share in SST's space to back up the claim.

12. Royalties. SST received a number of one time up front license fees in 1999. These high one time up front fees in 1999 made last quarter's y/y quarterly comparisons look weak. The run time royalties from these license agreements are just now beginning to ramp up and I expect SST's sequential quarterly license revenues will steadily improve. SST licenses SuperFlash technology to leading semiconductor companies including Analog Devices, ATMI, IBM, ISD, Motorola, National Semiconductor, Samsung, Sanyo, Seiko-Epson and TSMC to embed in semiconductor devices that integrate flash memory with other functions on a single chip.

13. Competition. I am still trying to figure out who the competition is. It seems like everyone went to higher density products and left SST alone---at least for very low density code storage. For some of SST's products that involve higher nand flash densities, there is lots of competition.

14. Tornado. SST is in a tornado in just about every imaginable way an investor could elect to measure a tornado. Trailing twelve month growth in both earnings and revenues, forward twelve month growth in both earnings and revenues, and the growth in the embedded applications market all meet the tornado growth definition.

15. Valuation: If third quarter earnings come in at 35 cents per share, at today's price, SSTI will be only selling at 36 times trailing earnings. If SSTI meets CY 2001 consensus earnings estimates of $1.76 per share, which are likely to be raised following this earnings pre announcement, at today's price, SSTI is only selling at 15 times CY 2001 earnings.

SST is expected to have over 1 billion in sales next year. At today's price SST is only selling at a 2.4 PSR on next year's sales.

If anyone can find any other hi tech companies with widely adopted proprietary technology growing at triple digit rates and selling at low forward multiples like this, I would like to hear about them. Please PM me the info.

Best, Huey

Disclaimer: The above represents my DD on SST at this point in time. Although I have taken a position in SST, I plan to continue on with more SST DD. Please do your own DD before investing!



To: Mike Buckley who wrote (32625)10/2/2000 10:31:54 AM
From: Dr. Id  Respond to of 54805
 
Analysis: Apple Reality Check

2000-09-29 09:30:00.0 ~David Reynolds

Shortly after Wall Street closed Thursday, Apple posted a warning that their
revenues for the September quarter would be lower than forecasted. As soon
as we saw that, we had an informal pool about how long it would be before
"beleagured Apple" stories started to appear.

Whoever had four hours won.

Within twelve hours, the hand-wringing and waving was in full force, with
"troubled Apple" stories popping up all over: on the Net, in the paper, and
on TV. Many of these stories amplify the bad news to an almost ridiculous
point, or they just plain get the facts wrong.

The most misleading graphic we've seen to date is at C|net. It charts
Apple's earnings per share without correcting for the stock split. The
result is a graphic that seems to show earnings per share dropping each
quarter. Of course, if you do the math and actually correct for the stock
split, Apple's earnings per share are actually almost flat. The story itself
is accurate, however, and C|net later fixed the chart.

Our favorite quote can be found on TheStreet.com, and we quote: "'It's a
shocking preannouncement because it's so bad,' says Jeff Matthews, president
of Connecticut-based hedge fund Ram Partners." This from a hedge-fund
manager who is short-selling Apple. This from someone who stands to make a
lot of money if Apple stock goes down.

Here's a reality check: Apple is projecting a profit of $110 million this
quarter, but that's down from its original forecast of $165 million. Look at
these numbers for a second: Apple is projecting a profit of over $100
million (that's a profit of around 31 cents a share), and that's enough to
send investors running for cover, and the press running to dust off their
"embattled Apple" headlines. For an example from another industry, United
Airlines announced that they'll take a loss next quarter instead of a 97
cent a share profit. This compares to a $3.75 a share profit a year ago. And
what happened to its stock? It dropped around 5 percent as we're writing
this, compared to Apple dropping by 50 percent. Apple closed at 25 3/4, down
from yesterday's close of 53 1/2.

One potential difference here is that UAL has a P/E (price-to-earnings)
ratio of around 9, and Apple was sporting one of around 50 before its stock
plummeted last night. (As we're writing this, it's around 25). Of course,
comparing performance across industrial sectors has its share of problems —
Apple doesn't fly airplanes, and UAL doesn't build cube-shaped
supercomputers.

No doubt: this is bad news for investors, who were basing their valuation of
Apple on continued growth into the PC market. Instead, Apple has reclaimed
the old Mac market circa 1995, but its sales have leveled out since reaching
that point. If you put money into AAPL as it was spiking recently, you're
probably out a big chunk of change.

On the other hand, this is hardly disastrous news, especially for the
average joe Mac user. Apple is making a 100-million-plus-dollar profit,
which is up from last quarter and up from a year ago.

We see two things happening here. First, there's been a lot of unease about
Apple in the financial community which no one wanted to do anything about,
mainly because Apple is making money. Second — let's face it, there's no
love lost between Apple and press analysts. With the slightest scent of
blood in the water, Apple is going to be at the center of a feeding frenzy —
we've seen the first bits of this with the Chiat/Day pressuring the press
stories a few weeks ago, followed by the cracked cube stories this week.

There are some real problems here, too. The Power Mac G4 cube didn't sell
nearly as well as Apple thought, probably because there's no real market for
a system that's too expensive to be an entry-level system but not expandable
enough to be a pro-level system. Apple has also seen a downturn in its
education sales, which raises some warning flags. After all, Apple is almost
synonymous with education, and to see demand grow slack there, well, that's
a little disturbing.

Today's stock tumble also highlights anxiety in the tech sector in general.
Between profit warnings from several companies and product delays, it's a
rough time to be a tech investor.

Still, there's no cause for panic. Apple is plenty profitable, it has killer
products out, Mac OS X is well on the way, and, well, everything is
generally peachy over there. Not as peachy as Apple previousy thought, but
still not bad.