Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (35076)	9/30/2000 5:13:32 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Respond to of 35569

Richard, Well, you seem to lack any vestiges of common sense. Bill

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (35076)	9/30/2000 8:43:02 PM
From: paunch13	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 35569

Richard, Jackson always seems to talk out of his hind end with no proof of what he is saying, I am in possession of all of the assays that IPM did since their beginning , and they have COC assays done by BD that are .046 FREE gold, not micro-fine and COC from Bateman that are .036 FREE gold , either of which were high enough numbers to make a good mine. IPM was not a scam because of not having any gold, but they may well have been because of management. Don't be surprised to see something happening with that property in the next year or two.