SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TeraBeam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: signist who wrote (203)10/4/2000 12:50:32 PM
From: Rob Preuss  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 227
 
Interesting comments about TeraBeam...

From the STXN thread on Yahoo!

messages.yahoo.com

> TeraBeam isn't a threat anytime soon
> by: fun_da_mental_man
>
> 10/4/00 12:09 pm
>
> Msg: 9785 of 9786
>
> Since I do respect George Gilder, when I read that TeraBeam
> was going to revolutionize the world, I chose to research it
> very carefully. I actually almost invested in the company
> about a year ago. So, i'm not completely going to dismiss it.
>
> However, i have spoken with engineers at the company, a co-
> founder, several competitors, and engineers from two
> companies that have tested it. I try to do my analysis at as
> low a level as i can get with people who really know the
> product and aren't going to hype it up.
>
> It does work -- although there appear to be some severe
> limitations according to those I spoke with on more than one
> occasion. First, they say distance is nowhere near the 1-2
> miles claimed. Second, the product has not been cost reduced
> to achieve the claimed low cost that george made. Third,
> PTMP is tricky. Now, when i use the word "they", i'm not
> claiming that every one of them said exactly the same thing, fyi.
>
> So, in the near term, it's not a big threat. Long term, if
> they can fix these problems, they may be a threat -- but
> even then, it'll only be a threat for the very shortest of
> distances.
>
> They were supposed to be shipping in huge quantities already
> -- and to my knowledge, they are not. So, get used to the
> over-hype and under-delivery. Many companies do it, so i'm
> not trying to pick on them specifically.
>
> Gilder, as you know, picked PCOM as the next great thing
> several years ago without even testing the technology
> developed by innova -- which obviously was superior. So, GG
> knows a lot, but not always.
>
> As an aside, the worst investment mistake ever made by me
> was to take gilder's advice and invest in NOVL. What a loser
> investment. Gilder was right about their NDS technology, but
> way off base on the company as a whole.
>
> Hope this helps.