Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (56068)	10/2/2000 2:11:44 AM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 93625

BTW, the market has overreacted to bad news a lot lately.... at other times it overreacts to good news. The price of INTC's stock has nothing to do with the veracity of an INTC official who allows his name to be associated with comments about the company's performance. However, when a known liar attempts to make statements that are completely contrary to quotes from named company officials..... I'll side with the one without the credibility problem, thank you very much. "BTW, don't you realize that you look like a puppy barking at a limo? Links, claims, liars, bark, bark... " How do I send you a quarter so you may call someone who cares? While you're at it, ponder this.... I have found it to be wise to be extremely leery of folks who post 24/7 on investment boards.... particularly those who repeatedly get caught in lies, misstatements & FUD..... even more so when they also claim to have some special knowledge.... then claim they have no financial or investment interest..... & spread/spin their clear bias that cannot be independently supported..... If they lie when it can be independently proven.... what is the value of their (claimed) special knowledge that can't be independently verified? Oh, & how much potential harm can occur to unwitting investors if this individual is also lying about this special knowledge he claims to posses? Ö¿Ö w2