SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: art slott who wrote (41380)10/1/2000 8:48:44 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Let's see, what's the cleaver little word game are you playing with this one. Obviously our armed forces have been more than decimated over the last 8 years. Moral is rock bottom, they keep lowering the requirements to fill the reduced ranks. Hmm.

Ah to hell with it, I'm unable to parse your question in a way to get a no out of it and still stay in this universe. You're one clever little liberal.



To: art slott who wrote (41380)10/1/2000 9:20:22 PM
From: Frank Griffin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
I would say absolutely the military was significantly stronger under Bush. And, my lady tells me I have what it takes to please a wonderful woman. *s*



To: art slott who wrote (41380)10/2/2000 8:01:23 AM
From: kvkkc1  Respond to of 769667
 
Yes the military was stronger under George Bush. Look at the readiness reports. The equipment we're using today is 8 years older with way too much deferred maintenance. The troop cuts have nullified the ability to perform the National Strategy, as stated by the Chairman, in a squirrely way, to avoid a handslap from the SecDef.knc


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News