Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (23934)	10/3/2000 11:18:32 AM
From: Perspective	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

As the insider tracking services have been pointing out, much of those sales are coming near year lows. Now if I remember right, that would be bearish. BC

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (23934)	10/3/2000 11:34:35 AM
From: XBrit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

it'd probably take 2 -3 billion in daily inflows to merely keep the market stable in the face of this selling barrage. vanguard.com Mutual fund inflows are likely dead meat for the rest of 2000. Not only is there fear of distributions, but there will be actual redemptions to set money aside for the associated tax bills. I have been thinking for a while that the supply/demand thing is getting way too little attention. Lockups, insiders, IPOs, it's all really unfavorable.

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (23934)	10/3/2000 12:05:33 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

< it'd probably take 2 -3 billion in daily inflows to merely keep the market stable in the face of this selling barrage.> Ho ho... I took "How to turn a good idea into a medium sized Hawaiian Island" in school, didn't you???? Ho ho... un-real that people are just tossing their coin into the ring at this point in the cycle to me. DAK