SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (56372)10/3/2000 4:30:53 PM
From: Dave B  Respond to of 93625
 
Scumbria,

You don't need to spend $3000 on a nonexistent P4 system to figure that out.

Are you saying I should spend it on a non-existent DDR-II system instead?

Dave



To: Scumbria who wrote (56372)10/3/2000 4:30:55 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Scumbria,
You know P4 is 3.2Gb/s. Why do you intentionally mislead?

And why are you talking about DDR PCs like they are real? They are vaporware. They are more non-existent than any other type of PC on the planet. Care to point me to one real production DDR PC where anyone can buy? At least RDRAM has been out there and also the 840 is proof of dual channel RDRAM, not some pie in the sky.

So please stick to facts or we'll start taking it up a notch again.



To: Scumbria who wrote (56372)10/3/2000 4:38:08 PM
From: Dave B  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Scumbria,

sylvester80 is correct. In the P4, the two channels will give 3.2GBs.

Were you intentionally being misleading as to the comparison of a P4 RDRAM system with a DDR-II system?

Dave