Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (75453)	10/3/2000 2:45:24 PM
From: William JH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

Douglas - I'm sure you already know this, for those who don't, there was an article in the L. A. Times last week which reported that California has been able to import much less electricity from Oregon this year due to fact that less hydro-electricity is being produced there. Concern for Salmon was cited.

To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (75453)	10/3/2000 6:27:37 PM
From: Second_Titan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

Power Generation Facility Ramping Douglas combined cycle CC facilities ramp up and down quite well. Especially CC facilities with multiple gas turbines. There are many CC facilities in service that shutdown completely at night and start up in the morning. Simple cycle peakers are justified for peak shaving at the extreme end of demand with limited operating hours expected annually. I am not sure of the capabilities of Nuc's to vary output significantly, but coal plants can vary output to maintain dispatch. But CC plants are probably best suited for load following within a system. But one thing for sure is that hydropower taken out of service will be replaced with NG burning turbines. Have you heard of any coal plants being built in the USA in the last few years? Several by IPP's maybe 5-10 years ago, but I am not aware of any very recently.