Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (1383)	10/3/2000 3:33:45 PM
From: Solon	Respond to of 28931

I've been up for 27 hours. 1.5 hours sleep and get ready for work--talk later.

To: Solon who wrote (1383)	10/3/2000 3:34:18 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

You said: You cannot both state than relativism can hold moral value, while at the same time holding that morality must include more than the subject. I don't really remember saying that. I do remember this one: Message 14481177 Me: When I referred to "taking positive action" I meant parenthetically "against others in defense of your principles". I didn't mean any action at all of moral consequence. Pushing your kid out of the way isn't necessarily a "good thing" outside of my sphere (everyone else might hate my kid). emphasis added Is this what you're referring to? I didn't think this conflicted with what I've been saying. If I'm genuinely inconsistent, I'd like to fix it (for my own mental edification). But, be warned, I may just throw my hands up and say, "Dunno!".