Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: niceguy767 who wrote (11332)	10/3/2000 6:44:53 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

Niceguy, What would a close below $20 signal? John

To: niceguy767 who wrote (11332)	10/3/2000 7:14:45 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (7) \| Respond to of 275872

RE:"Once the Hale-Bopper analysts' erroneous psychological tie between the AAPL and INTC Q3 misfortunes and AMD is broken" We've been in a bear. Been my experience that in a bear even good stocks can trade close to book value. That said...cutting away AAPL from Intel and AMD will be no problem. As for AMDs ties to Intel, I suggest the best thing is for Intel to do well and AMD to do better...because h$ll is likely to freeze over before WS decouples them. Jim

To: niceguy767 who wrote (11332)	10/3/2000 8:00:28 PM
From: DRBES	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Technical Schmecknical!!! All of this pales in the absence of the most dependable of positive indicators: Unbridled anger and FUD from pauL, youseF, & Co. I used to generally ignore a majority of theiR posTs sampling one or two from time to time for reliable very bitter flavor; and when my SI listing was very blue (ie a lot of theiR posts); I knew AMD was about to begin a significant up move. Patient Regards, DARBES