Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (42069)	10/3/2000 7:04:30 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Well, interesting timing...NOW after the Justice has cost the American people millions of dollars....both in taxes, as well as stock valuation....at 6:22 this evening (before the debates) wants a fast track for this critical sector of the economy...The JD is totally beyond arrogance... Government Seeks Fast Microsoft Appeal Schedule By David Lawsky Oct 3 6:22pm ET WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Justice Department Tuesday asked the U.S. court of appeals to move on a fast track for written arguments in Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT.O) appeal of antitrust violations, arguing it was ``essential'' for a ``critical sector'' of the economy. The government asked for a process that would be completed before year's end, less than half the time and with briefs half the length sought by Microsoft. The Justice Department asked for oral arguments in January, as the current administration is winding down. But even with a quick schedule oral arguments might take place after a new president is inaugurated Jan. 20. In June, a lower court judge ordered the company split in two after finding it competed unfairly to protect a monopoly in its Windows operating system. The judge also ordered other remedies, but stayed them until all appeals are completed. ``Because the District Court stayed implementation of the judgement in its entirety pending appeal, at Microsoft's request and over plaintiff's objections, it is essential for effective antitrust law enforcement in a critical sector of the nation's economy that the appeal be concluded expeditiously,'' the Justice Department argued. In a statement, Microsoft replied that its scheduled would ''allow for a prompt and efficient process to consider the appeal. We are confident of our case on appeal and look forward to the court of appeals instruction on the schedule and length of briefs.'' Microsoft has until Oct. 10 to reply, after which the court will set the dates. The Justice Department noted that it had made its filing two days ahead of the deadline and said, ''Microsoft should be similarly able to expedite its reply.'' Last week, the Supreme Court turned down a direct appeal of the case, rejecting a Justice Department argument that quick action was needed because technology evolves so swiftly. Instead, the high court sent down the case to seven judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals. Justice asked that the Court of Appeals direct Microsoft to file a 24,000-word brief by Nov. 1. The federal government would reply at equal length on Dec. 8, and on the same day states involved in the case would be allowed a 7,000-word brief. Microsoft would reply on Dec. 22 at 7,000 words. Microsoft told the appeals court Monday the two sides should take five months to exchange filings in the case, and said the initial briefs from both sides should be a hefty 56,000 words, with the company's final reply at 28,000 words. The government called that ``excessive'' and argued it would lead to delay. ``This is an appeal, not a retrial,'' said the government. If the appeals court acts immediately and if it accepts the company's proposal, the government would not file until early February, well after a new president was inaugurated. Microsoft said the ``monumental'' case made the extra wordage necessary. ``Parties normally are allotted 14,000 words for principal briefs and 7,000 words for reply briefs,'' the company said. ''Those word limits are insufficient for a case of this magnitude and complexity, in which Microsoft's very corporate survival is at stake.''