SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bilow who wrote (56564)10/4/2000 3:05:06 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Bilow,
There goes your "class" out the window. I must be getting to you. Didn't mean to. ;-)

These are simple questions looking for simple answers. I'm glad to see you agree with me that DDR1600 sucks. So we agree that DDR200 (a.k.a PC1600) is D.O.A. Considering that DDR266 has even more stability and compatibility problems and that there will be no volume production of DDR200 let alone DDR266 till next year at the earliest (if ever), then we'll also have to say that DDR is totally and completly D.O.A. Nobody in their right mind will buy this crap. DDR is "too little too late". A memory without a market.



To: Bilow who wrote (56564)10/4/2000 4:22:13 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
"The DDR chips they used in the sharkyextreme benchmark also had lousy latency."

Carl please explain