SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tony Viola who wrote (112376)10/4/2000 2:16:29 PM
From: Gary Ng  Respond to of 186894
 
Tony, Re: Of course, when the P4 comes out it will be different, and size, I mean GHz will matter again. <VBG>

Um sounds so familiar, Intel makes the fastest CPU that matters <VBG>

gary



To: Tony Viola who wrote (112376)10/4/2000 2:20:02 PM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 186894
 
Tony,

re: Of course, when the P4 comes out it will be different, and size, I mean GHz will matter again. <VBG>

Too many 'Droid's posting here, we are starting to think like they do.

John



To: Tony Viola who wrote (112376)10/4/2000 2:53:52 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Pentium 4 yields 'not impressive'
By: Andrew Thomas
Posted: 04/10/2000 at 16:06 GMT

Someone at Intel's notoriously-leaky Qiryat-Gat plant (Fab 18) in Israel has been blabbing to Israeli paper Haaretz about teething troubles with the upcoming Pentium 4 chip.

Haaretz reports that there are only two steppers in the world capable of handling one critical part of the P4 manufacturing process. Both of them are at Qiryat-Gat and one of them doesn't work properly.

The paper claims that P4 was meant to be built using new machines which weren't delivered on time and the old steppers aren't really up to the task with yields of 70 per cent on the P4 compared with 80 per cent for Pentium III parts.

And due to P4's larger die size, only 100 chips per wafer can be built, compared with 250 PIIIs. As a result, P4 production is running at just 70,000 a week, Intel reportedly having set a target of 100,000 a week before the part can be launched.

theregister.co.uk

Another example of the register's world class stupidity.

If the P4 is over 2x the size of PIII and still yields at 70% compared to 80% for PIII, that would be phenomenal! And the 250 PIII die per wafer is a bit much I would guess, even for Intel.

These guys are clueless.

EP